How much cgi in the hobbit

After Del Doro steped out of director'S chair, and Jackson's failure to have Neill Blomkamp take his place, he was in a position that he either directed the films hiself, or the project would be shattered in pieces.

LOTR was a labor of love for he cast and crew. Peter had no such passion directing the Hobbit. It was the equivalent of having to do a homework in his least favorite subject. Even Ian McKellen confirmed this. Jackson got lazy with the Hobbit films. Which is why he's using so much CGI. That would explain the souless feeling I have from the Hobbits films so far.

User Info: mkhomero. CitanKainUzuki posted That's really sad to hear, especially the Ian McKellen part. Still excited for Battle of the Five Armies. I'm trying to imagine how Neill Blomkamp would of made these movies, that would be something to see at the very least. More topics from this board They're not the perfect movies, but it's a perfect adventure. Oh, and there's a dragon who's a total baller. Other people, however, didn't really appreciate the films. In fact, they really hated them. The criticism has been that the movies were overly exaggerated, there was too much CGI and it didn't need to be stretched into a trilogy.

Now, a fan theory suggests the films were actually meant to be a little ridiculous and needlessly drawn out. The Theory: "The Hobbit" films were bloated with CGI and long-winded because they represent Bilbo's own exaggerated retellings of his adventure. Redditor Questionbdp posed the idea as "internal justification" for why the movies were a "disappointment," and it actually makes sense. The Redditor explains:.

What Bilbo actually experienced during his adventure with the Dwarves was probably far less significant and monumental than the movies make it out to be, because the movies show how Bilbo retells his adventures, not how he actually lived them. The theory goes on to say Bilbo probably felt bummed after he returned from his adventure to find all the other Hobbits didn't care and were selling off all his stuff.

It all comes down to preproduction time. Mostly because of rights issues. You might have heard that The Hobbit looks kind of weird. The movie was shot with a special camera developed by the founder of Oakley sunglasses weirdly enough , at 48 frames per second fps.

That frame rate seem to make people generally unhappy. Born out of a lifetime spent steeped in epic mythology and ancient lore, Middle-earth possesses a uniquely deep sense of depth unparalleled in modern fiction. They used rain and shadows to help the T-Rex blend in. This helps significantly with helping the effect blend in. You cannot pass! Peter Jackson attempted to use less CGI to make the movie appear as natural as possible. The Lord of the Ring trilogy is a remarkable achievement.

The Fellowship of the Ring book was published in with the other two released in half year intervals until , and still sells well. It got an uptick in sales after the movies were released in — As one of the Maiar he is an immortal spirit, but being in a physical body on Middle-earth, he can be killed in battle, as he is by the Balrog from Moria.

He is sent back to Middle-earth to complete his mission, now as Gandalf the White and leader of the Istari.

His body lay on the peak. Easter eggs and callbacks to The Lord of the Rings were shamelessly forced into the unnecessary subplots of The Hobbit. The Hobbit falls into the pitfalls of the prequel by focusing too much on the past and not enough on telling its own stories. Part of this is due to the fact that those films had so much more information they needed to cover. Lord of the Rings adapted 3 books one per movie , whereas The Hobbit spread one book over three films.

Because MGM had not yet greenlit the project, he was afraid all his hard work would be thrown away if the studio got too frustrated. He kept putting off quitting, but ultimately he was unable to stay. The Hobbit trilogy is no different. The theme of the dwarves is just as exciting and unique as anything in the original trilogy.